shale Comfort vs Coolray GF+ Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Price Comparison
EGP 1278006
EGP 1258843
EGP 1229728
EGP 1211313
EGP 17201
EGP 16943
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2520
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2160
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4702
4380
1903
1800
1691
1615
2765
2600
382
/
/
18
/
4
Fuel Economy
14.8
17.8
55
45
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10.25" TFT Screen
/
Passenger Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Suede
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
7DCT
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
Electric
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230
172 BHP
370
290
/
91
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Comfort, Economy, Adaptive
/
✓
/
✓
