shale Comfort vs Tucson 2025 Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
EGP 1278006
EGP 1267533
EGP 1229728
EGP 1219662
EGP 17201
EGP 17060
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 108
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 756
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2520
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3240
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 39420
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1596 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4702
4500 mm
1903
1865 mm
1691
1650 mm
2765
2680 mm
382
620 L
/
4 Doors
/
210 m
Fuel Economy
14.8
11 Km/L
55
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.25
✓
/
8
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
8-Speed Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/45 R19
/
235/45 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
230
177 BHP
370
264 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
