CarteaCompare CarsTang L EV 670 Standard vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR

Tang L EV 670 Standard vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Powerful off-road capabilities
  • Exceptional reliability and durability
  • Interior comfort and luxury equipment

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0 L/KM

0.11 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

/

Daily Fule Payment

EGP 104.5

Weekly Fule Payment

/

Weekly Fule Payment

EGP 731.5

Monthly Fule Payment

/

Monthly Fule Payment

EGP 3135

Yearly Fule Payment

/

Yearly Fule Payment

EGP 38142.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

5040

5145

1996

1980

1760

1890

2950

/

Fuel Economy

/

9.3

/

110

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

DHT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

/

/

/

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Engine

Electric

Gasoline

680 BHP

409 BHP

/

3.5 L

/

650

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

BYD | Tang L EV 670 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR-L2

BYD | Tang L EV 670 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2012 4.0L

BYD | Tang L EV 670 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2017 4.0L GXR

BYD | Tang L EV 670 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2014 4.0L GXR

BYD | Tang L EV 670 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR

BYD Related Car

Toyota Related Car