Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
EGP 1878268
EGP 1548235
EGP 1807338
EGP 1489774
EGP 25280
EGP 20838
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 70
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 490
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2170
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 25550
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
3
3
2355
2155
16
16
5915
5265
1950
1950
2280
1990
3860
3210
3500
3200
6.4m
5.5m
3180 - 1760 - 1605
2530 - 1760 - 1340
9.3m³
6.2m³
1145
1045
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
9.1 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
3.5
Diesel
Gasoline
174
277
420
351
Technologies
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)



