Hiace Van High Roof DSL MT vs Hiace Van High Roof GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
EGP 1878268
EGP 1741406
EGP 1807338
EGP 1675629
EGP 25280
EGP 23438
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 82
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 132
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 574
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 924
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2460
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3960
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 29930
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 48180
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
3
3
2355
2295
16
16
5915
5915
1950
1950
2280
2280
3860
3860
3500
3400
6.4m
6.4m
3180 - 1760 - 1605
3180 - 1760 – 1605
9.3m³
9.3m³
1145
1105
Fuel Economy
13.0 Km/L
9.1 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
3.5
Diesel
Gasoline
174
277
420
351
Technologies
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
