ET9 100kwh vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
EGP 3416996
TBD
EGP 3287980
TBD
EGP 45990
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3465
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
4
7 Seater
5325
5115 mm
2017
1980 mm
1621
1920 mm
3250
2890 mm
/
5 Doors
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
35
6
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
255/45 R22
/
255/45 R22
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
707 BHP
271 BHP
/
V
/
4.0 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
385 Nm
Motor
700
/
✓
/
2
/
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
