Atto 3 Comfort vs Territory Ambient Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Cohesive and stylish exterior design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Balanced engine and steering performance
Negative
- Improve the quality of interior materials and assembly
- Modernization of technological and entertainment systems
- Improved suspension characteristics to reduce vibration
Price Comparison
EGP 1529882
EGP 1510931
EGP 1472110
EGP 1453854
EGP 20591
EGP 20336
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 57
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 399
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1767
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 20805
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
200 km/h
Chinese
GCC
/
4
/
1798 cc
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4455
4630 mm
1875
1935 mm
1615
1706 mm
2720
2726 mm
310
385 L
205 mm
190 mm
Fuel Economy
/
15.9
/
60 L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
5
7
Front Row Seats
/
LCD
TFT
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Single
Single
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
Battery/Charging
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
201 BHP
190 BHP
310 Nm
320 Nm
/
In-Line
/
1.8 L
/
4
Motor
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
