Tiggo 4 Pro vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 1618740
EGP 1619561
EGP 1557600
EGP 1558403
EGP 21787
EGP 21798
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
2490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
18 inch
/
4820
4570 mm
1930
1845 mm
1699
1660 mm
2630
2660 mm
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
/
14.9 Km/L
51
55 L
/
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
Safety
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
√
/
215/55 R18
/
215/55 R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
156
203 BHP
115
/
230
243 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
