SONG PLUS Design vs Toyota Fortuner 2012 4.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 136.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 955.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 4231.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 49822.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
187
/
6
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
7 Seater
1790
/
19
/
5
/
4775
4700
1890
1800
1680
1800
2765
2660
574
348
Fuel Economy
14.5
7.9
/
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
LCD
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
✓
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag, Integrated side air curtains
/
Front and Rear
/
✓
/
4x Front Sensor, 4x Rear Sensor
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Seats
/
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6-inch rotating screen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
DIRAC
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Multi- link(5 links)
/
Wheels/brakes
VENTILATED DISC
/
DISC
/
235/50 R19
/
235/50 R19
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
4.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
319 BHP
235 BHP
520
376
Motor
596
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
/
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical, Sand and Mud Terrain Mode
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
