CarteaCompare CarsRX9 COM 2WD 2025 vs Toyota Fortuner 2012 4.0L

RX9 COM 2WD 2025 vs Toyota Fortuner 2012 4.0L Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Strong off-road performance
  • Spacious and comfortable interior
  • Reliability and well known Toyota quality

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • Outdated internal technology
  • Less stability at high speeds

Price Comparison

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.13 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

EGP 66.5

Daily Fule Payment

EGP 123.5

Weekly Fule Payment

EGP 465.5

Weekly Fule Payment

EGP 864.5

Monthly Fule Payment

EGP 2061.5

Monthly Fule Payment

EGP 3828.5

Yearly Fule Payment

EGP 24272.5

Yearly Fule Payment

EGP 45077.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

187

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

21

/

/

4700

/

1800

/

1800

/

2660

/

348

Fuel Economy

14.8

7.9

/

80

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

3

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

12

/

Bose

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9-Speed Automatic

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

235 BHP

235 BHP

/

376

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | RX9 COM 2WD 2025

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR-L2

MG | RX9 COM 2WD 2025

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2012 4.0L

MG | RX9 COM 2WD 2025

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2017 4.0L GXR

MG | RX9 COM 2WD 2025

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2014 4.0L GXR

MG | RX9 COM 2WD 2025

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR

MG Related Car

Toyota Related Car

Toyota Related Used Car