Qin Plus Premium vs Accent 1.5 Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Simple and comfortable interior design
- High reliability in daily use
Negative
- Engine performance may be limited
- Storage space is not the best
- Sound insulation is below average
Price Comparison
EGP 1042186
EGP 1008078
EGP 1002829
EGP 969988
EGP 14027
EGP 13568
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 38
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 47.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 266
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 332.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1140
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1425
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 13870
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 17337.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
/
/
4
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
1620
17
/
4
4
4765
4535
1837
1765
1495
1475
2720
2670
500
/
Fuel Economy
26
18.9
48
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
177 BHP
115 BHP
325
144
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
