MG ZS 2024 1.5L STD vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2022 3.5T GXR-L2 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 63
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 441
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1953
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 22995
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
10.9
/
Engine / Motor
170
/
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4314
5115
1809
1980
1624
1945
2585
/
448
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
9.3
48
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
112 BHP
409 BHP
150
650
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
