Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs FORTUNER GX2 4X4 Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Price Comparison
EGP 1889926
EGP 1888811
EGP 1818530
EGP 1817452
EGP 25437
EGP 25422
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 76
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 95
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 532
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 665
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2356
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2945
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 27740
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 34675
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
4
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
5075
4795
1969
1855
1716
1835
2930
/
407
/
/
17
/
4
Fuel Economy
11.9
10.3
74
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Part Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
164 BHP
420
245
/
91
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓