Land Cruiser 3.5T EXR vs Defender 110 HSE (P400) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Price Comparison
EGP 4403906
EGP 4332276
EGP 4237627
EGP 4168678
EGP 59273
EGP 58309
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 105
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 735
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3255
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 38325
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
208 km/h
3460 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5115 mm
5018 mm
1980 mm
2008 mm
1920 mm
1965 mm
2850 mm
3022 mm
1004 L
/
235 mm
/
Fuel Economy
9.3 Km/L
10.1 Km/L
110 L
90 L
9.3 Km/L
10.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
409 BHP
400 BHP
650 Nm
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
