Hiace Van STD GAS MT vs Expert Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 1548235
EGP 1416420
EGP 1489774
EGP 1362900
EGP 20838
EGP 19064
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 43.75
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 306.25
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1356.25
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 15968.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
6
/
Dimensions
3
2
2155
/
16
/
5265
4403
1950
1848
1990
1898
3210
2975
3200
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
/
/
3.8
Fuel Economy
9.1 Km/L
18.2
70
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0
Gasoline
Diesel
277
150
351
370
/
110
/
3750
/
1500
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
