Hiace Van High Roof DSL AT vs Hiace Van STD DSL MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
EGP 1977153
EGP 1665332
EGP 1902461
EGP 1602458
EGP 26611
EGP 22414
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 82
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 82
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 574
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 574
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2460
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2460
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 29930
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 29930
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
Dimensions
3
3
2360
2210
16
16
5915
5265
1950
1950
2280
1990
3860
3210
3500
3300
6.4m
5.5m
3180 - 1760 - 1605
2530 - 1760 - 1340
9.3m³
6.2m³
1140
1090
Fuel Economy
12.6 Km/L
13.0 Km/L
70
70
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
4.2
4.2
✓
✓
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
8
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
2
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
Macpherson Strut
Macpherson Strut
Leaf spring rigid
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Drum
Drum
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
2.8
2.8
Diesel
Diesel
174
174
450
420
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
