Coolray 2025 GL vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive exterior design
- Smart and versatile technical equipment
- Dynamic performance suitable for City and Highway
Negative
- Interior materials need improvement
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Sound insulation at high speeds is insufficient
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
EGP 1044038
EGP 1377644
EGP 1004589
EGP 1325618
EGP 14052
EGP 18542
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2232
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1477 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4380 mm
4709 mm
1810 mm
1897 mm
1615 mm
1745 mm
2600 mm
2705 mm
330 L
331 L
180 mm
/
Fuel Economy
16 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
45 L
55 L
16 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
172 BHP
181 BHP
290 Nm
245 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
