300 Conqueror 2.0T vs RAV4 2.5L Adventure Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 2031177
EGP 2006879
EGP 1954484
EGP 1931095
EGP 27338
EGP 27011
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 95
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 66.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 665
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 465.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2945
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2061.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 34675
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 24272.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4610 mm
1930 mm
1865 mm
1927 mm
1690 mm
2750 mm
2660 mm
400 L
/
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
224 BHP
203 BHP
387 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
