3-Seater Chassis CAB L3H1 vs Hiace Van STD GAS MT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
EGP 1755602
EGP 1548235
EGP 1689309
EGP 1489774
EGP 23629
EGP 20838
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
3
3
2021kg
2155
16
16
6193
5265
2283
1990
3682
3210
4.5T
3200
166
/
/
1950
/
5.5m
/
2530 - 1760 - 1340
/
6.2m³
/
1045
Fuel Economy
100
70
/
9.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Side Driver Airbag.Driver & Passenger Airbags.
Driver & Front Passenger
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
8
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
2
Transmission
✓
/
6-Speed Manual Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson Strut
/
Leaf spring rigid
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
215/70R16C
/
215/70R16C
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
3.5
Diesel
Gasoline
125
277
/
351
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
