Urban Cruiser GL vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
EGP 1096567
EGP 768906
EGP 1055135
EGP 739830
EGP 14759
EGP 10349
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 52.5
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 63
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 367.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 441
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1470
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1764
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 19162.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 22995
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
170
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
17
4365
4323
1795
1809
1645
1653
2600
2585
210
145
/
1318
/
5
/
359/1166
Fuel Economy
19.8
17.2
45 L
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.1
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
4
4
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
215/60 R17
215/55 R17
/
Disc
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
118 BHP
135
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
