Shine E3 vs Suzuki Ciaz 2024 1.5L GLX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Very economical in fuel consumption
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low purchase and maintenance cost
Negative
- Relatively poor engine performance
- The quality of interior materials is amenable to improvement
- Lack of advanced technological features
Price Comparison
EGP 949605
EGP 909260
EGP 913723
EGP 874900
EGP 12781
EGP 12238
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2520
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2160
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
165
4
4
1496 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4 Doors
/
4670 mm
4490
1812 mm
1730
1490 mm
1475
2680 mm
2650
454 L
495
150 mm
/
Fuel Economy
14
16.7
50 L
43
14 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
7
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Strut Coil Springs
/
Torsion Beam with Coil Springs
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
/
Wheels/brakes
205/50 R17
/
205/50 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
1
/
4
/
195 BHP
104 BHP
300 Nm
130
Technologies
✓
✓
ECO/ SPORT
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
