RX9 COM 4WD vs ZR-V LX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Comfortable and practical interior design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced security technologies and systems
Negative
- Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
- Pricing may be higher than competitors
- Modest engine performance compared to some competitors
Price Comparison
EGP 1583676
EGP 1578252
EGP 1523878
EGP 1518660
EGP 21315
EGP 21242
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2520
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
4
Dimensions
7
5
21
18 英寸
4983
4567
1967
1840
1786
1621
2915
2657
/
1488
/
380
/
186
Fuel Economy
14.8
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
3
/
✓
/
255/45 R21
/
✓
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
9
12
8
Bose
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
9-Speed Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
MacPhersan
麦弗逊式独立悬挂
Multi-link
多连杆式独立悬挂
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
255/45 R21
225/55 R18
255/45 R21
225/55 R18
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
235 BHP
180
350
240
/
In-Line
/
Turbocharge
/
1.5L VTEC Turbo
/
有
/
4
/
132.4
/
6000
/
1700-4500
/
直喷
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
