Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
EGP 1016328
EGP 3416996
EGP 977936
EGP 3287980
EGP 13679
EGP 45990
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 57
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 104.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 399
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 731.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1710
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3135
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 20805
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 38142.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
210 km/h
4
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4295
5115 mm
1760
1980 mm
1590
1920 mm
2620
2890 mm
432
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.4 Km/L
41
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
271 BHP
149
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
