NEW 2008 vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
EGP 1281500
EGP 3416996
EGP 1233100
EGP 3287980
EGP 17248
EGP 45990
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 115.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 808.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3580.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 42157.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4304
5115 mm
1775
1980 mm
1550
1920 mm
2605
2890 mm
434
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
√
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Electric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
130
271 BHP
96
/
5500
/
230
385 Nm
1750
/
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
