Master L2H2 vs Toyota Hiace 2024 2.8L Van M/T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and versatile space
- High durability and reliability
- Excellent stability and driving quality
Negative
- Simple interior design and limited passenger comfort
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Sound insulation and suspension system need to be improved
Price Comparison
EGP 1216710
EGP 1008080
EGP 1170746
EGP 970000
EGP 16376
EGP 13568
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 70
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 490
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2170
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 25550
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
160
Dimensions
3
3 Seater
1934 kg
/
16
/
5548
5265
2499
1990
3682
3210
3.5T
/
174 mm
/
10.8m³
/
/
1950
/
6200
Fuel Economy
100
70
/
13.3
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.3
2.8 L
Diesel
Diesel
125
174 BHP
/
420
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
