LiteAce VAN Gasoline MT vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
EGP 871450
EGP 1111571
EGP 838547
EGP 1069552
EGP 11729
EGP 14961
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
190 km/h
Dimensions
2
5
1230
/
14
18
4045
4571 mm
1665
1855 mm
1930
1719 mm
2650
2708 mm
2000
/
4.9m
/
2075 - 1495 - 1305
/
3.4m³
/
770
/
/
430 L
/
145
Fuel Economy
14.1 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
43
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger
2
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
14.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
2
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
5-Speed Manual Transmission
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Coil Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Drum
/
165R14C
225/50 R18
165R14C
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
96.5
171 BHP
134
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
