CarteaCompare CarsHS 2.0T Comfort vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Laredo 3.6L

HS 2.0T Comfort vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Laredo 3.6L Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Versatility of options for powerful engines
  • Impressive off-road driving capabilities
  • High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies

Negative

  • High fuel consumption for some models
  • High price compared to some competitors
  • Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces

Price Comparison

EGP 1153261

TBD

EGP 1109705

TBD

EGP 15522

TBD

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.11 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

EGP 76

Daily Fule Payment

EGP 104.5

Weekly Fule Payment

EGP 532

Weekly Fule Payment

EGP 731.5

Monthly Fule Payment

EGP 2356

Monthly Fule Payment

EGP 3239.5

Yearly Fule Payment

EGP 27740

Yearly Fule Payment

EGP 38142.5

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

210 km/h

181

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4574 mm

4821

1876 mm

1943

1685 mm

1730

2720 mm

2916

463 L

1028

Fuel Economy

12.2 Km/L

8.8

55 L

93

12.2 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

231 BHP

290 BHP

360 Nm

350

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Changan | CS35 Plus Limited

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

JAC | JAC JS4 2024 1.5T Deluxe

MG | HS 2.0T Comfort

VS

Omoda | C5 2025 Luxury

MG Related Car

Jeep Related Car

MG Related Used Car