Ciciv SPORT vs Cerato 1.6L EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High fuel efficiency
- Long lasting reliability
- High quality interior design
Negative
- Limited rear space for passengers
- Average off road performance
- An insufficiently innovative infotainment system
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Price Comparison
EGP 1347621
EGP 1298292
EGP 1296702
EGP 1249260
EGP 18138
EGP 17474
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
190
/
4
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4689
4640
1801
1800
1415
1440
,735
2700
/
427
Fuel Economy
47
53
/
14.9
Comfort
√
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
√
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
✓
/
√
✓
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
128 BHP
112
/
6400
/
181
154
5000
/
Technologies
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
√
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
