ZS 1.5L STD vs RX5 1.5T STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful engine performance
- Spacious internal storage capacity
- High quality interior materials
Negative
- Fuel consumption is higher than expected
- Relatively old navigation technologies
- Off-road driving comfort is limited
Price Comparison
EGP 768906
EGP 1111571
EGP 739830
EGP 1069552
EGP 10349
EGP 14961
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 63
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 73.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 441
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 514.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1953
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2278.5
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 22995
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26827.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
190 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1318
/
17
18
5
/
4323
4571 mm
1809
1855 mm
1653
1719 mm
2585
2708 mm
359/1166
430 L
145
145
Fuel Economy
17.2
14.7 Km/L
45
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
2
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
14.1
✓
✓
✓
✓
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
215/55 R17
225/50 R18
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
171 BHP
88
/
180
275 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
