ZS 1.5L STD vs 900 2.0T Ultra Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 768906
TBD
EGP 739830
TBD
EGP 10349
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2160
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
240
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
6
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
5240
1809
1999
1653
1810
2585
3160
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
/
45
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
275/45 R21
215/55 R17
275/45 R21
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
540 BHP
88
/
180
1038
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
