Veloz GX vs Jetour X50 Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical in fuel consumption
- High reliability and stable performance
Negative
- Limited engine capacity for high power
- Relatively old entertainment technologies
- Interior materials are less luxurious than some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 1181495
EGP 937562
EGP 1136871
EGP 902110
EGP 15902
EGP 12619
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 108
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 756
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3348
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 39420
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
1498
GCC
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4475 mm
4397
1750 mm
1841
1700 mm
1654
2890 mm
2601
350 L
/
205 m
/
/
18
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
/
43 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Vinyl Upholstery
Faux Leather
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
4
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Infotainment
8
10.25
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
✓
6
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
6-DCT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Macpherson independent suspension
/
Multiple link independent suspension
/
EPS
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
Ventilated
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
105 BHP
156
138 Nm
230
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
