T2 Standard vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 2109336
EGP 1619561
EGP 2029677
EGP 1558403
EGP 28390
EGP 21798
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 108
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 756
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3348
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 39420
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
4570 mm
2006 mm
1845 mm
1880 mm
1660 mm
2800 mm
2660 mm
752 L
/
220 mm
/
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
70 L
55 L
11 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
None
4
4
250 BHP
203 BHP
390 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
