T2 Standard vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
EGP 2109336
EGP 3416996
EGP 2029677
EGP 3287980
EGP 28390
EGP 45990
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 108
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 132
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 756
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 924
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3348
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 4092
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 39420
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 48180
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
210 km/h
4
6
1998 cc
3490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
5115 mm
2006 mm
1980 mm
1880 mm
1920 mm
2800 mm
2890 mm
752 L
1004 L
220 mm
221 m
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
70 L
110 L
11 Km/L
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
15.6
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
12
6
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
250 BHP
271 BHP
390 Nm
385 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
