RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 1619561
EGP 1958657
EGP 1558403
EGP 1884681
EGP 21798
EGP 26362
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 120
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 840
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3720
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 43800
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2490 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4570 mm
4760 mm
1845 mm
1930 mm
1660 mm
1927 mm
2660 mm
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
10 Km/L
55 L
75 L
14.9 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
203 BHP
224 BHP
243 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)