Mazda CX-9 2024 2.5T Grade 3 (FWD) vs T2 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Attractive and modern design
- Outstanding financial value
- Spacious interior space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Suspension tuning is strict
- Average noise insulation
Price Comparison
EGP 1889926
EGP 2109336
EGP 1818530
EGP 2029677
EGP 25437
EGP 28390
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 76
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 85.5
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 532
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 598.5
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2280
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2565
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 27740
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 31207.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
180 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5075
4785 mm
1969
2006 mm
1716
1880 mm
2930
2800 mm
407
752 L
/
5 Doors
/
220 mm
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
226 BHP
250 BHP
420
390 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓