Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD vs Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SL + NIM + Brown Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
EGP 1397703
EGP 1389160
EGP 1344912
EGP 1336699
EGP 18812
EGP 18697
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 57
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 57
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 399
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 399
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1767
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1767
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 20805
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 20805
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
192
180
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4395
4295
1795
1760
1562
1590
2655
2620
430
432
Fuel Economy
16.7
15.4
48
41
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
155 BHP
118 BHP
200
149
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓