Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 3416996
EGP 1619561
EGP 3287980
EGP 1558403
EGP 45990
EGP 21798
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 132
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 924
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 4092
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 48180
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210 km/h
200 km/h
6
4
3490 cc
2490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
5115 mm
4570 mm
1980 mm
1845 mm
1920 mm
1660 mm
2890 mm
2660 mm
1004 L
/
221 m
/
Fuel Economy
9.4 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
110 L
55 L
9.4 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
In-Line
4.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
None
4
4
271 BHP
203 BHP
385 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
