Dashing 1.6L Turbo vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Integrated interior fittings
- Excellent value for the price
Negative
- Engine performance needs improvement
- Noise insulation is limited by driving methods
- The suspension is solid off-road
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 1558261
EGP 1619561
EGP 1499404
EGP 1558403
EGP 20973
EGP 21798
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 96
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 672
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2976
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 35040
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1590 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4590 mm
4570 mm
1900 mm
1845 mm
1685 mm
1660 mm
2720 mm
2660 mm
160 mm
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
57 L
55 L
12 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
None
4
4
194 BHP
203 BHP
290 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
