Captiva LS vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2017 Laredo 3.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Price Comparison
EGP 1089139
TBD
EGP 1047994
TBD
EGP 14659
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 104.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 731.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3239.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 38142.5
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
/
181
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
1051L
1028
/
4821
/
1943
/
1730
/
2916
Fuel Economy
/
8.8
/
93
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2 Front and sides
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
HALOGEN
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
144 BHP
290 BHP
/
350
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
