Atto 3 Comfort vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
EGP 1529882
EGP 3416996
EGP 1472110
EGP 3287980
EGP 20591
EGP 45990
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 104.5
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 731.5
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3135
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 38142.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
210 km/h
Chinese
GCC
/
6
/
3490 cc
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4455
5115 mm
1875
1980 mm
1615
1920 mm
2720
2890 mm
310
1004 L
205 mm
221 m
Fuel Economy
/
9.4 Km/L
/
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
5
/
Front Row Seats
✓
LCD
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Single
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
9
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
6
6
Battery/Charging
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
/
Transmission
AT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Macpherson
/
Multi-Link
/
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
201 BHP
271 BHP
310 Nm
385 Nm
/
V
/
4.0 L
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Motor
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
