300 Challenger 2.0T vs Toyota Rush 2022 1.5L Full Option Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive design
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Economical fuel efficiency
Negative
- Engine performance is poor at high speeds
- Low quality interior design
- Lack of modern technical features
Price Comparison
EGP 1958657
EGP 426100
EGP 1884681
EGP 410000
EGP 26362
EGP 5735
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 120
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 96
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 840
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 672
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3720
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2976
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 43800
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 35040
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
175
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4435
1930 mm
1695
1927 mm
1705
2750 mm
2685
400 L
213
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12.5
75 L
45
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1496 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
103 BHP
387 Nm
135
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
