300 Challenger 2.0T vs RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
EGP 1958657
EGP 1619561
EGP 1884681
EGP 1558403
EGP 26362
EGP 21798
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 120
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 840
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3720
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2604
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 43800
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4570 mm
1930 mm
1845 mm
1927 mm
1660 mm
2750 mm
2660 mm
400 L
/
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
224 BHP
203 BHP
387 Nm
243 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
