300 Challenger 2.0T vs Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Price Comparison
EGP 1958657
EGP 1016328
EGP 1884681
EGP 977936
EGP 26362
EGP 13679
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 120
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 840
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 3720
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2232
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 43800
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4295
1930 mm
1760
1927 mm
1590
2750 mm
2620
400 L
432
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
15.4
75 L
41
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
118 BHP
387 Nm
149
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
