RAV4 2.5L (4WD) EXR vs HS3 2.0T 4WD Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 1619561
EGP 1617401
EGP 1558403
EGP 1556302
EGP 21798
EGP 21769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 84
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 72
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 588
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 504
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2520
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 2160
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 30660
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 26280
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
4
4
2490 cc
1990 cc
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4570 mm
4655 mm
1845 mm
1900 mm
1660 mm
1668 mm
2660 mm
2770 mm
Fuel Economy
14.2 Km/L
17
55 L
/
14.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sports
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
Transmission
Automatic
8-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.5 L
2.0T
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
203 BHP
248 BHP
243 Nm
380 Nm
/
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
