Accent 1.5 Smart vs Qin Plus FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Simple and comfortable interior design
- High reliability in daily use
Negative
- Engine performance may be limited
- Storage space is not the best
- Sound insulation is below average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
EGP 586798
EGP 1202150
EGP 564589
EGP 1156748
EGP 7898
EGP 16180
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.04 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 60
Daily Fule Payment
EGP 48
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 420
Weekly Fule Payment
EGP 336
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1800
Monthly Fule Payment
EGP 1440
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 21900
Yearly Fule Payment
EGP 17520
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
/
185
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
1620
1500
4
4
4535
4765
1765
1837
1475
1495
2670
2720
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
500
Fuel Economy
18.9
26
/
48
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
8.8
/
LCD
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
/
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Battery/Charging
/
6.6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
/
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
115 BHP
197 BHP
144
325
/
Plug in Hybrid
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
